|
Message from the Chair
DR. ESMERALDA M.A. THORNHILL
* CALL FOR ACTION * "The following situation is unacceptable and it concerns us all. The letter is self-explanatory. Using your own initiative, please take whatever action you and/or your organization deem appropriate and necessary."
URGENT - FOR IMMEDIATE ATTENTIONBY FAX: (613) 943-0044 Dalhousie Law School The Honorable Anne McLellan SUBJECT: Exclusion
of Her Honour Judge Corrine Sparks Honorable Minister: As the first holder of the distinguished James
Robinson Johnston Endowed Chair in Black Canadian Studies , established
in 1996 at Dalhousie University "to bring Black culture, reality, perspectives,
experiences and concerns into the Academy", and as a member of the
legal profession, I am compelled to formally submit to you the following
situation that demands immediate redress. The news of the non-appointment of Her Honour Judge Corrine Sparks to the New Unified Family Court of Nova Scotia is being met with widespread disbelief and shock throughout the legal and Black Communities of both Nova Scotia and Canada. The Community of Women is particularly targeted both as high volume service-users of the Family Court, and as a group traditionally excluded from promotion to the Bench. Appointed to the Judiciary in 1987, Judge Sparks is
the most senior woman and the only Black judge sitting in the Family
Court of the province of Nova Scotia. Indeed, until 1996 she was
the only Black judicial appointee in this entire province. Widely known
in the legal profession and community, Judge Sparks is also held in very
high regard by Black communities across Canada. Throughout her twelve (12) years on the Bench, this senior Black Woman judge of the Nova Scotia Family Court has proven that she is a good judge; and she has been very influential in the judicial system. Judge Sparks has assiduously discharged her duties to Court, colleagues, and public alike. Her expertise has been called upon by the legal profession, and has been unstintingly given to assist in judicial training, as well as in research. In the eyes of many, to her belongs the credit for having moved Canadian law forward in a significant way, both for the Judiciary and for Equality-seeking groups. One of her decisions, RDS v. The Queen, was upheld and reaffirmed in 1997 by the Supreme Court of Canada and it is now considered by legal scholars, educators, and practitioners to be a landmark case establishing groundbreaking authority in the matter of "Race". In short, Minister McLellan, Judge Sparks has served as an exemplary model for Black people, for Women, and for the entire legal community. Consequently, for us in this province, "the cradle of Canada's largest indigenous Black population", it is an earth-shattering shock that a person of her legal standing and public stature should have been treated in such a discreditable manner. The opprobrium of this non-recognition is acutely felt, individually and collectively, privately and publicly. It defies the understanding of any "reasonable person", even as it flies in the face of the plethora of Federal Government pronouncements, policies, and professed commitments to Equity and racial equality. In my capacity as one of the only two (2) Black tenured Full Professors teaching Law in Canada's universities, and as a lawyer and experienced Human Rights advocate and educator, I am uniquely positioned to attest the piffling progress made thus far to eradicate systemic inequality and to make Law more accessible and meaningfully inclusive for historically marginalized groups. This unfathomable decision to not elevate Judge Corrine Sparks to the Unified Family Court of Nova Scotia is an anomaly that casts the administration of Justice into disrepute. For a senior judge with the legal reputation and public persona of Judge Sparks to see others of less or no comparable experience being promoted at the same time that she herself is passed over, this non-recognition constitutes a demotion and a personal affront to her dignity. This non-appointment is a giant step backwards for the Canadian judicial system as a whole and for the African Canadian Community of Nova Scotia who, down through the years, have all too frequently known only the oppressive heel of Law. Be they man, woman, or child, the symbolism is lost on no-one. Indeed, right across Canada, this volta face by the Department of Justice, a key Ministry of the Federal Government, will have a far-reaching and chilling effect on Black people, on Women, and more significantly, on those members of the Judiciary who factor the "material reality" of people's lives into their vocation of judging, as they strive to make Law and our Courts a more respectful place for all people. From my vantage point as James Robinson Johnston Chair, I affirm to you that Black people of Nova Scotia -- and indeed Black people right across Canada -- are slighted and cheated. We, as a Community, are outraged by this individual and collective affront that would turn back the Clock of Progress and tell us yet again that we are insignificant. Therefore, as a member of
the legal profession, and as James Robinson Johnston Chair, I join those
members of the Community of the Concerned and formally beseech
you, Minister McLellan, to intervene with the utmost speed before the
swearing in ceremony scheduled to take place on Tuesday, March 30th 1999,
and use your good office to: I further implore you to put in place mechanisms that will start guaranteeing an equitable representation for racial minorities in all federal appointments to the Judiciary. I thank you in advance for your prompt attention to
this matter and I look forward to hearing from you very soon. Sincerely, Dr. Esmeralda M.A. Thornhill James Robinson Johnston Chair c.c. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
©Copyright 2001 James Robinston Chair in Black Canadian Studies. All rights reserved. Dalhousie Disclaimer |
Last Updated: April 3, 2002